• Alcala, F. & Ciccone, A., 2004. Trade and Productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), pp.613–646.
• Abstract

We find that international trade has an economically significant and statistically robust positive effect on productivity. Our trade measure is imports plus exports relative to purchasing power parity GDP (real openness), which we argue is preferable on theoretical grounds to the nominal measure conventionally used. We also find a significantly positive aggregate scale effect. Our estimates control for proxies of institutional quality as well as geography and take into account the endogeneity of trade and institutional quality. Our analysis of the channels through which trade and scale affect productivity yields that they work through total factor productivity.

• BibTeX
@article{Alcala:2004fk,
author = {Alcala, Francisco and Ciccone, Antonio},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:55:19 +0000},
journal = {Quarterly Journal of Economics},
keywords = {ec7350,flow,ec7340},
number = {2},
pages = {613-646},
volume = {119},
year = {2004}
}

• Andersen, T. & Dalgaard, C.-J., 2011. Flows of people, flows of ideas, and the inequality of nations. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(1), pp.1–32. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

The present paper examines a neglected determinant of aggregate productivity: temporary cross-border flows of people. We hypothesize that interaction between people from different nations facilitates the international diffusion of ideas, thus stimulating aggregate productivity. In order to assess the causal impact of people flows on productivity, we construct an instrument for people flows. By analogy to the trade/growth literature, this instrument is derived from a fitted gravity equation involving geographic determinants of bilateral travel flows. Our cross-section analysis reveal that greater international interaction leads to higher productivity; a very similar result, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, is obtained when we employ dynamic panel data methods for the purpose of identification.

• BibTeX
@article{ad2011,
affiliation = {University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark},
author = {Andersen, Thomas and Dalgaard, Carl-Johan},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:55:25 +0000},
issn = {1381-4338},
issue = {1},
journal = {Journal of Economic Growth},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
pages = {1-32},
publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
title = {Flows of people, flows of ideas, and the inequality of nations},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9060-7},
volume = {16},
year = {2011},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9060-7}
}

• Broda, C., Greenfield, J. & Weinstein, D., 2006. From Groundnuts to Globalization: A Structural Estimate of Trade and Growth. NBER Working Papers, (12512).
• Abstract

Starting with Romer [1987] and Rivera-Batiz-Romer [1991] economists have been able to model how trade enhances growth through the creation and import of new varieties. In this framework, international trade increases economic output through two channels. First, trade raises productivity levels because producers gain access to new imported varieties. Second, increases in the number of varieties drives down the cost of innovation and results in ever more variety creation. Using highly disaggregate trade data, e.g. Gabon’s imports of Gambian groundnuts, we structurally estimate the impact that new imports have had in approximately 4000 markets per country. We then move from groundnuts to globalization by building an exact TFP index that aggregates these micro gains to obtain an estimate of trade on productivity growth for each country. We find that in the typical country in the world, new imported varieties account for 15 percent of its productivity growth. These effects are larger in developing countries where the median impact of new imported varieties equals a quarter of national productivity growth.

• BibTeX
@article{broda_etal_2006,
author = {Broda, Christian and Greenfield, Joshua and Weinstein, David},
date-modified = {2015-03-17 13:50:35 +0000},
journal = {NBER Working Papers},
keywords = {flow,intro},
month = sep,
number = {12512},
title = {From Groundnuts to Globalization: A Structural Estimate of Trade and Growth},
year = {2006},
}

• Broda, C., Greenfield, J. & Weinstein, D.E., 2010. From Groundnuts to Globalization: A Structural Estimate of Trade and Growth.
• Abstract

Starting with Romer [1987] and Rivera-Batiz-Romer [1991] economists have been able to model how trade enhances growth through the creation and import of new varieties. In this framework, international trade increases economic output through two channels. First, trade raises productivity levels because producers gain access to new imported varieties. Second, increases in the number of varieties drives down the cost of innovation and results in ever more variety creation. Using highly disaggregate trade data, e.g. Gabon’s imports of Gambian groundnuts, we structurally estimate the impact that new imports have had in approximately 4000 markets per country. We then move from groundnuts to globalization by building an exact TFP index that aggregates these micro gains to obtain an estimate of trade on productivity growth for each country. We find that in the typical country in the world, new imported varieties account for 15 percent of its productivity growth. These effects are larger in developing countries where the median impact of new imported varieties equals a quarter of national productivity growth.

• BibTeX
@misc{Broda:2010ys,
author = {Broda, Christian and Greenfield, Joshua and Weinstein, David E.},
date-modified = {2016-01-25 14:59:11 +0000},
howpublished = {Working paper},
keywords = {flow},
title = {From Groundnuts to Globalization: A Structural Estimate of Trade and Growth},
year = {2010}
}

• Coe, D. & Helpman, E., 1995. International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), pp.859–87.
• Abstract

Investment in research and development (R&D) affects a country’s total factor productivity. Recently new theories of economic growth have emphasized this link and have also identified a number of channels through which a country’s R&D affects total factor productivity of its trade partners. Following these theoretical developments we estimate the effects of a country’s R&D capital stock and the R&D capital stocks of its trade partners on the country’s total factor productivity. We find large effects of both domestic and foreign R&D capital stocks on total factor productivity. The foreign R&D capital stocks have particularly large effects on the smaller countries in our sample (that consists of 22 countries). Moreover, we find that about one-quarter of the worldwide benefits of investment in R&D in the seven largest economies are appropriated by their trade partners.

• BibTeX
@article{Coe:1995fk,
author = {Coe, David and Helpman, Elhanan},
date-modified = {2013-04-21 15:00:13 +0000},
journal = {European Economic Review},
keywords = {intro,ec7350;flow},
number = {5},
pages = {859-87},
title = {International R\&D Spillovers},
volume = {39},
year = {1995}
}

• Comin, D., Dmitriev, M. & Rossi-Hansberg, E., 2012. The Spatial Diffusion of Technology.
• Abstract

We study empirically technology diffusion across countries and over time. We find significant evidence that technology diffuses slower to locations that are farther away from adoption leaders. This effect is stronger across rich countries and also when measuring distance along the south-north dimension. A simple theory of human interactions can account for these empirical findings. The theory suggests that the effect of distance should vanish over time, a hypothesis that we confirm in the data, and that distinguishes technology from other flows like goods or investments. We then structurally estimate the model. The parameter governing the frequency of interactions is larger for newer and network-based technologies and for the median technology the frequency of interactions decays by 73% every 1000 Kms. Overall, we document the significant role that geography plays in determining technology diffusion across countries.

• BibTeX
@unpublished{Comin:2012ve,
author = {Comin, Diego and Dmitriev, Mikhail and Rossi-Hansberg, Estaban},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:57:01 +0000},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
month = nov,
note = {NBER Working Paper 18534},
title = {The Spatial Diffusion of Technology},
year = {2012}
}

• Comin, D., Easterly, W. & Gong, E., 2010. Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in 1000 BC? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), pp.pp. 65–97. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

We assemble a dataset on technology adoption in 1000 BC, 0 AD, and 1500 AD for the predecessors to today’s nation states. Technological differences are surprisingly persistent over long periods of time. Our most interesting, strong, and robust results are for the association of 1500 AD technology with per capita income and technology adoption today. We also find robust and significant technological persistence from 1000 BC to 0 AD, and from 0 AD to 1500 AD. The evidence is consistent with a model where the cost of adopting new technologies declines sufficiently with the current level of adoption.

• BibTeX
@article{Comin2010,
author = {Comin, Diego and Easterly, William and Gong, Erick},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:57:05 +0000},
issn = {19457707},
journal = {American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics},
jstor_articletype = {research-article},
jstor_formatteddate = {July 2010},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
number = {3},
pages = {pp. 65-97},
publisher = {American Economic Association},
title = {Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in 1000 BC?},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25760309},
volume = {2},
year = {2010},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25760309}
}

• Comin, D. & Hobijn, B., 2010. An Exploration of Technology Diffusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), pp.2031–59.
• Abstract

We develop a model that, at the aggregate level, is similar to the one-sector neoclassical growth model; at the disaggregate level, it has implications for the path of observable measures of technology adoption. We estimate it using data on the diffusion of 15 technologies in 166 countries over the last two centuries. Our results reveal that, on average, countries have adopted technologies 45 years after their invention. There is substantial variation across technologies and countries. Newer technologies have been adopted faster than old ones. The cross-country variation in the adoption of technologies accounts for at least 25 percent of per capita income differences.

• BibTeX
@article{ch2010,
author = {Comin, Diego and Hobijn, Bart},
date-modified = {2016-03-06 16:43:02 +0000},
journal = {American Economic Review},
keywords = {flow},
month = dec,
number = {5},
pages = {2031-59},
title = {An Exploration of Technology Diffusion},
volume = {100},
year = {2010}
}

• David, P., 1990. The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox. American Economic Review, 80(2), pp.355–61.
• BibTeX
@article{David:1990qf,
author = {David, Paul},
date-modified = {2016-03-06 16:43:09 +0000},
journal = {American Economic Review},
keywords = {intro,flow},
month = may,
number = {2},
pages = {355-61},
title = {The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox},
volume = {80},
year = {1990}
}

• Feyrer, J., 2009. Distance, Trade, and Income - The 1967 to 1975 Closing of the Suez Canal as a Natural Experiment.
• Abstract

The negative effect of distance on bilateral trade is one of the most robust findings in international trade. However, the underlying causes of this negative relationship are less well understood. This paper exploits a temporary shock to distance, the closing of the Suez canal in 1967 and its reopening in 1975, to examine the effect of distance on trade and the effect of trade on income. Time series variation in sea distance allows for the inclusion of pair effects which account for static differences in tastes and culture between countries. The distance effects estimated in this paper are therefore more clearly about transportation costs in the trade of goods than typical gravity model estimates. Distance is found to have a significant impact on trade with an elasticity that is about half as large as estimates from typical cross sectional estimates. Since the shock to trade is exogenous for most countries, predicted trade volume from the shock can be used to identify the effect of trade on income. Trade is found to have a significant impact on income. The time series dimension allows for country fixed effects which control for all long run income differences. Because identification is through changes in sea distance, the effect is coming entirely through trade in goods and not through alternative channels such as technology transfer, tourism, or foreign direct investment.

• BibTeX
@unpublished{Feyrer:2009cr,
author = {Feyrer, James},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:57:47 +0000},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
month = dec,
note = {NBER Working Paper 15557},
title = {Distance, Trade, and Income - The 1967 to 1975 Closing of the Suez Canal as a Natural Experiment},
year = {2009}
}

• Feyrer, J., 2009. Trade and Income - Exploiting Time Series in Geography.
• Abstract

Establishing a robust causal relationship between trade and income has been difficult. Frankel and Romer (1999) use a geographic instrument to identify a positive effect of trade on income. Rodriguez and Rodrik (2000) show that these results are not robust to controlling for omitted variables such as distance to the equator or institutions. This paper solves the omitted variable problem by generating a time varying geographic instrument. Improvements in aircraft technology have caused the quantity of world trade carried by air to increase over time. Country pairs with relatively short air routes compared to sea routes benefit more from this change in technology. This heterogeneity can be used to generate a geography based instrument for trade that varies over time. The time series variation allows for controls for country fixed effects, eliminating the bias from time invariant variables such as distance from the equator or historically determined institutions. Trade has a significant effect on income with an elasticity of roughly one half. Differences in predicted trade growth can explain roughly 17 percent of the variation in cross country income growth between 1960 and 1995.

• BibTeX
@unpublished{Feyrer:2009bh,
author = {Feyrer, James},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:57:43 +0000},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
month = apr,
note = {NBER Working Paper 14910},
title = {Trade and Income - Exploiting Time Series in Geography},
year = {2009}
}

• Frankel, J.A. & Romer, D., 1999. Does Trade Cause Growth? The American Economic Review, 89(3), pp.pp. 379–399. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

Examining the correlation between trade and income cannot identify the direction of causation between the two. Countries’ geographic characteristics, however, have important effects on trade, and are plausibly uncorrelated with other determinants of income. This paper therefore constructs measures of the geographic component of countries’ trade, and uses those measures to obtain instrumental variables estimates of the effect of trade on income. The results provide no evidence that ordinary least-squares estimates overstate the effects of trade. Further, they suggest that trade has a quantitatively large and robust, though only moderately statistically significant, positive effect on income.

• BibTeX
@article{Frankel1999,
author = {Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Romer, David},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:57:57 +0000},
issn = {00028282},
journal = {The American Economic Review},
jstor_articletype = {research-article},
jstor_formatteddate = {Jun., 1999},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
number = {3},
pages = {pp. 379-399},
publisher = {American Economic Association},
title = {Does Trade Cause Growth?},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/117025},
volume = {89},
year = {1999},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/117025}
}

• Galor, O. & Mountford, A., 2008. Trading population for productivity: theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 75(4), pp.1143–1179.
• Abstract

This research argues that the differential effect of international trade on the demand for human capital across countries has been a major determinant of the distribution of income and population across the globe. In developed countries the gains from trade have been directed towards investment in education and growth in income per capita, whereas a significant portion of these gains in less developed economies has been chanelled towards population growth. Cross-country regressions establish that indeed trade has positive effects on fertility and negative effects on education in non-OECD economies, while inducing fertility decline and human capital formation in OECD economies.

• BibTeX
@article{galor2008trading,
author = {Galor, Oded and Mountford, Andrew},
date-modified = {2015-03-17 13:13:49 +0000},
journal = {Review of Economic Studies},
keywords = {divergence,flow},
number = {4},
pages = {1143--1179},
publisher = {Wiley Online Library},
title = {Trading population for productivity: theory and evidence},
volume = {75},
year = {2008}
}

• Griffith, R., Redding, S. & Reenen, J. van, 2004. Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a panel of OECD Countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), pp.883–895.
• Abstract

Many writers have claimed that research and development (R&D) has two faces. In addition to the conventional role of stimulating innovation, R&D enhances technology transfer (absorptive capacity). We explore this idea empirically using a panel of industries across twelve OECD countries. We find R&D to be statistically and economically important in both technological catch-up and innovation. Human capital also plays an major role in productivity growth, but we only find a small effect of trade. In failing to take account of R&D-based absorptive capacity, existing U.S.-based studies may underestimate the return to R&D.

• BibTeX
@article{Griffith:2004dz,
author = {Griffith, Rachel and Redding, Stephen and van Reenen, John},
date-modified = {2013-04-21 15:00:13 +0000},
journal = {Review of Economics and Statistics},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
month = nov,
number = {4},
pages = {883-895},
title = {Mapping the Two Faces of R\&D: Productivity Growth in a panel of OECD Countries},
volume = {86},
year = {2004}
}

• Hanlon, W.W., 2015. Necessity Is the Mother of Invention: Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change. Econometrica, 83(1), pp.67–100. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

This study provides causal evidence that a shock to the relative supply of inputs to production can (1) affect the direction of technological progress and (2) lead to a rebound in the relative price of the input that became relatively more abundant (the strong induced-bias hypothesis). I exploit the impact of the U.S. Civil War on the British cotton textile industry, which reduced supplies of cotton from the Southern United States, forcing British producers to shift to lower-quality Indian cotton. Using detailed new data, I show that this shift induced the development of new technologies that augmented Indian cotton. As these new technologies became available, I show that the relative price of Indian/U.S. cotton rebounded to its pre-war level, despite the increased relative supply of Indian cotton. This is the first paper to establish both of these patterns empirically, lending support to the two key predictions of leading directed technical change theories.

• BibTeX
@article{walker15,
author = {Hanlon, W. Walker},
date-modified = {2016-03-06 16:43:19 +0000},
doi = {10.3982/ECTA10811},
issn = {1468-0262},
journal = {Econometrica},
keywords = {flow},
number = {1},
pages = {67--100},
publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
title = {Necessity Is the Mother of Invention: Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10811},
volume = {83},
year = {2015},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10811}
}

• Keller, W., 2004. International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), pp.752–782. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

This paper surveys what is known about the extent of international technology diffusion and channels through which technology spreads. Productivity differences explain much of the variation in incomes across countries, and technology plays a key role in determining productivity. The pattern of worldwide technical change is determined largely by international technology diffusion because a few rich countries account for most of the world’s creation of new technology. Cross-country income convergence turns on whether technology diffusion is global or local. There is no indication that international diffusion is inevitable or automatic, but rather, domestic technology investments are necessary. Better understanding of what determines the effectiveness of technology diffusion sheds light on the pace at which the world’s technology frontier may expand.

• BibTeX
@article{keller2004,
author = {Keller, Wolfgang},
date-modified = {2017-01-16 21:59:13 +0000},
issn = {00220515},
journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
jstor_articletype = {research-article},
jstor_formatteddate = {Sep., 2004},
keywords = {intro,ec7350,flow},
number = {3},
pages = {752-782},
publisher = {American Economic Association},
title = {International Technology Diffusion},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3217250},
volume = {42},
year = {2004},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3217250}
}

• Keller, W., 2002. Trade and the Transmission of Technology. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1), pp.5–24. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

This paper integrates earlier studies on the link of productivity and research and development (R&D) in different industries of a closed economy with the more recent emphasis on R&D-driven growth and international trade in open economies. In this framework, technology in the form of product designs is transmitted to other industries, both domestically as well as internationally, through trade in differentiated intermediate goods. I present empirical results based on a new industry-level data set that covers more than 65 percent of the world’s manufacturing output and most of the world’s R&D expenditures between 1970 and 1991. The analysis considers productivity effects from R&D in the domestic industry itself, from R&D in other domestic industries, as well as in the same and other foreign industries. I estimate strong productivity effects both from own R&D spending and R&D conducted elsewhere. The contribution of R&D in the industry itself is about 50 percent in this sample. Domestic R&D in other industries is the source of 30 percent of the productivity increases, and the remaining 20 percent are due to R&D expenditures in foreign industries.

• BibTeX
@article{keller2002,
author = {Keller, Wolfgang},
date-modified = {2013-04-21 15:00:13 +0000},
issn = {1381-4338},
issue = {1},
journal = {Journal of Economic Growth},
keywords = {ec7350,flow},
pages = {5-24},
publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
title = {Trade and the Transmission of Technology},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013461025733},
volume = {7},
year = {2002},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013461025733}
}

• Pavcnik, N., 2002. Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvement: Evidence from Chilean Plants. Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), pp.245–76. Available at: Link.
• Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the effects of trade liberalization on plant productivity in the case of Chile. Chile presents an interesting setting to study this relationship since it underwent a massive trade liberalization that significantly exposed its plants to competition from abroad during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Methodologically, I approach this question in two steps. In the first step, I estimate a production function to obtain a measure of plant productivity. I estimate the production function semi-parametrically to correct for the presence of selection and simultaneity biases in the estimates of the input coefficients required to construct a productivity measure. I explicitly incorporate plant exit in the estimation to correct for the selection problem induced by liquidated plants. These methodological aspects are important in obtaining a reliable plant-level productivity measure based on consistent estimates of the input coefficients. In the second step, I identify the impact of trade liberalization on plants’ productivity in a regression framework allowing variation in productivity over time and across traded- and non-traded-goods sectors. Using plant-level panel data on Chilean manufacturers, I find evidence of within plant productivity improvements that can be attributed to a liberalized trade policy, especially for the plants in the import-competing sector. In many cases, aggregate productivity improvements stem from the reshuffling of resources and output from less to more efficient producers.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

• BibTeX
@article{pavcnik02,
author = {Pavcnik, Nina},
date-modified = {2016-03-06 16:43:31 +0000},
journal = {Review of Economic Studies},
keywords = {flow},
month = jan,
number = {1},
pages = {245-76},
title = {Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvement: Evidence from Chilean Plants},
url = {http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/restud/v69y2002i1p245-76.html},
volume = {69},
year = {2002},
bdsk-url-1 = {http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/restud/v69y2002i1p245-76.html}
}

• Ramondo, N. & Rodriguez-Clare, A., Trade, Multinational Production, and the Gains from Openness. Journal of Political Economy.
• Abstract

This paper quantifies the gains from openness arising from trade and multinational production (MP). We present a model that captures key dimensions of the interaction between these two flows: Trade and MP are competing ways to serve a foreign market; MP relies on imports of intermediate goods from the home country; and foreign affiliates of multinationals can export part of their output. The calibrated model implies that the gains from trade can be twice as high as the gains calculated in trade-only models, while the gains from MP are slightly lower than the gains computed in MP-only models.

• BibTeX
@article{Ramondo:2012uq,
author = {Ramondo, Natalia and Rodriguez-Clare, Andres},
date-modified = {2015-03-17 13:11:09 +0000},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
keywords = {intro,flow},
title = {Trade, Multinational Production, and the Gains from Openness},
year = {forthcoming}
}

• Ramondo, N., Rodriguez-Clare, A. & Saborio-Rodriguez, M., 2012. Scale Effects and Productivity Across Countries: Does Country Size Matter?
• BibTeX
@unpublished{rrs2012,
author = {Ramondo, Natalia and Rodriguez-Clare, Andres and Saborio-Rodriguez, Milagro},
date-modified = {2015-03-17 13:18:11 +0000},
keywords = {flow},
note = {NBER Working Paper 18532},
title = {Scale Effects and Productivity Across Countries: Does Country Size Matter?},
year = {2012}
}

• Rodriguez, F. & Rodrik, D., 2000. Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-National Evidence. In B. Bernanke & K. Rogoff, eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, pp. 261–338.
• Abstract

Do countries with lower policy-induced barriers to international trade grow faster, once other relevant country characteristics are controlled for? There exists a large empirical literature providing an affirmative answer to this question. We argue that methodological problems with the empirical strategies employed in this literature leave the results open to diverse interpretations. In many cases, the indicators of "openness" used by researchers are poor measures of trade barriers or are highly correlated with other sources of bad economic performance. In other cases, the methods used to ascertain the link between trade policy and growth have serious shortcomings. Papers that we review include Dollar (1992), Ben-David (1993), Sachs and Warner (1995), and Edwards (1998). We find little evidence that open trade policies–in the sense of lower tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade–are significantly associated with economic growth.

• BibTeX
@incollection{rr2000,
author = {Rodriguez, Francisco and Rodrik, Dani},
booktitle = {NBER Macroeconomics Annual},
date-modified = {2015-03-17 13:18:05 +0000},
editor = {Bernanke, Ben and Rogoff, Ken},
keywords = {flow},
month = sep,
pages = {261-338},
publisher = {National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc},
title = {Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence},
volume = {15},
year = {2000}
}

• Young, A., 1991. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), pp.369–405. Available at: Link.
• BibTeX
@article{young91,
author = {Young, Alwyn},