Is the productivity growth rate stable?
Stability
The prior section describes the productivity growth rate along the BGP. But just as with the Solow model and the K/Y ratio, we want to know if that is a stable outcome. If the economy starts out with a gAgA above or below the BGP growth rate, does it have a tendency to return to gBGPAgBGPA? The simulation suggests that yes, it does. But why is that?
Go back to the expression for gAgA
gA=θsλRLλtA1−ϕt.gA=θsλRLλtA1−ϕt.Take a look at a dynamic figure representing this relationship. Here, I’ve plotted the growth rate (1−ϕ)gA(1−ϕ)gA (the sloped line), and the growth rate λgLλgL (the horizontal line). You can use this link to open the app in a separate tab (reommended).
No matter where you start, the system pushes you back to the point where the two lines cross, and where gA=gL×λ/(1−ϕ)gA=gL×λ/(1−ϕ), which is the BGP growth rate of productivity. This says that the productivity growth rate is stable.
But try adjusting the value of ϕϕ up towards 1. It becomes almost horizontal, and in that case the (1−ϕ)gA(1−ϕ)gA line may not intersect the λgLλgL line at all. In that case the system does not come to rest at a steady state. This means we’ve got another finding.
The growth rate of productivity along a BGP is stable at gBGPA=gLλ/(1−ϕ)gBGPA=gLλ/(1−ϕ) if the value of ϕ<1ϕ<1.
ϕ<1ϕ<1 essentially says that the growth rate of productivity must fall as productivity rises. It means that getting more productive cannot lead to an acceleration of productivity growth. The data suggest that this must be true. We do not see that productivity growth accelerates as productivity rises.
We’ll talk a little about AI later in the course, and see what happens if we think that this changes things such that ϕ>1ϕ>1 and we might have explosive growth.
The level of productivity
Just like we did with the Solow model, we want to distinguish between the growth rate of productivity on the BGP (gBGPAgBGPA) from the level of productivity on the BGP. Let’s go back to our formula for how productivity growth works, and note that this still holds along the BGP.
gBGPA=θsλRLλtA1−ϕt.gBGPA=θsλRLλtA1−ϕt.Since we know the growth rate along the BGP, this becomes
λ1−ϕgL=θsλRLλtA1−ϕtλ1−ϕgL=θsλRLλtA1−ϕtand this tells us how AtAt and LtLt are related along a BGP. To find the level of productivity at any given point in time on the BGP, start by taking logs
lnλ1−ϕ+lngL=lnθ+λlnsR+λlnLt−(1−ϕ)lnAt.lnλ1−ϕ+lngL=lnθ+λlnsR+λlnLt−(1−ϕ)lnAt.Now re-arrange this so that the (1−ϕ)lnAt(1−ϕ)lnAt is by itself on the left,
(1−ϕ)lnAt=lnθ−lnλ1−ϕ−lngL+λlnsR+λlnLt.(1−ϕ)lnAt=lnθ−lnλ1−ϕ−lngL+λlnsR+λlnLt.And finally divide by (1−ϕ)(1−ϕ) on both sides,
lnAt=11−ϕlnθ−11−ϕlnλ1−ϕ−11−ϕlngL++λ1−ϕlnsR+λ1−ϕlnLt.lnAt=11−ϕlnθ−11−ϕlnλ1−ϕ−11−ϕlngL++λ1−ϕlnsR+λ1−ϕlnLt.So productivity on the BGP depends on the level of LtLt, not surprising. Note that is also depends on the size of sRsR. The bigger the fraction of workers doing R&D, the higher the level of AtAt along the BGP. We know that the growth rate of productivity, gAgA, isn’t affected by sRsR.
Devoting a bigger share of workers to R&D will get us more productivity and potentially make the economy richer, yes. But it won’t necessarily increase the growth rate of productivity on a BGP. This is the same logic as with capital and the ratio sIsI. Using more of GDP to build capital will make us richer, but it won’t change the growth rate.
Visualizing the dynamics
For a different way of seeing what is going on, you can also try this spreadsheet which lays out the dynamics of productivity period by period. You can adjust the parameters and initial values of L and A to see how productivity growth evolves over time.
Or similar to the Solow model, the following app allows you to adjust parameters and see the impact on the level of productivity, the growth rate of productivity, and how the dynamic system works. Rather than using the embedded app, this link will take you directly to the app on its own page.